Design of A Normative sEMG Database for Biometric Comparison in Rehabilitation Research
Main Article Content
Keywords
Quantitative electromyography, Rehabilitation, Biomedical database, NoSQL
Abstract
Electromyography (EMG) is used in a wide range of research fields, such as physiotherapy, ergonomics, and neurorehabilitation. Normative EMG databases play a crucial and significant role in the efficient diagnosis and treatment of neuromuscular disorders. They can rapidly provide information that, although not necessarily diagnostic, can efficiently and effectively guide further diagnostic studies. Quantitative EMG (QEMG) in the upper extremities is an effective diagnostic tool, but there are currently few normative databases available. The absence of fundamental guidelines and established methods for creating normative databases contributes to a significant obstacle in the field of rehabilitation research. This study aims to bridge this gap by designing a dynamic, scalable, consistent, available, and partition-tolerant NoSQL database (DB), in alignment with the Consistency, Availability, and Partition Tolerance (CAP) theorem, to house normative surface EMG (sEMG) values for upper body muscles, primarily for biometric comparison in rehabilitation. The DB encompasses diverse EMG features, both in the time and frequency domains, as well as anthropometric variables, extracted by healthy participants and post-stroke or spinal cord injury patients. The participant selection is based on Greece's average demographic statistics and specific inclusion and exclusion criteria from existing clinical trials. The proposed DB is particularly designed to be continuously updated offering real-time insights, allowing the DB to be an even more valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working in the field.
Downloads
Abstract 704 | PDF Downloads 194
References
2. Konrad, P. The ABC of EMG: A Practical Introduction to Kinesiological Electromyography, 2006. Available online: https://www.studeersnel.nl/nl/document/universiteit-van-amsterdam/neurologie/the-abc-of-emg-by-peter-konrad/59807737.
3. Electromyography: Physiology, Engineering, and Non-Invasive Applications, 2023. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1002/0471678384.fmatter.
4. Pitt, M.C. and Jabre, J. The problem of lack of normative data in paediatric EMG and possible solutions. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018;129(3):672–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2017.11.024.
5. De Luca, C.J. The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics. J Appl Biomech.1997;13(2):135–163. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.13.2.135.
6. Farina, D., Merletti, R., Enoka, R.M. The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. J Appl Physiol. 2004;96(4):1486–1495. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01070.2003.
7. Meekins, G.D., So, Y., Quan, D. American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine evidence-based review: Use of surface electromyography in the diagnosis and study of neuromuscular disorders. Muscle Nerve. 2008;38(4):1219–1224. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.21055.
8. Jeppesen, T.D., Levison, L., Codeluppi, L., et al. Quantitative electromyography: Normative data in paraspinal muscles. Muscle Nerve. 2020;62(3):358–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.27000.
9. Ryan, C.S., Conlee, E.M., Sharma, R., et al. Nerve conduction normal values for electrodiagnosis in pediatric patients. Muscle Nerve. 2019;60(2):155–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.26499.
10. Brewer, E. CAP twelve years later: How the “rules” have changed. Computer. 2012;45(2):23–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.37.
11. Davoudian, A., Chen, L., Liu, M. A Survey on NoSQL Stores. ACM Comput Surv. 2018;51(2):1–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3158661.
12. Athanasiou, A., Mitsopoulos, K., Praftsiotis, A., et al. Neurorehabilitation Through Synergistic Man-Machine Interfaces Promoting Dormant Neuroplasticity in Spinal Cord Injury: Protocol for a Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022;11(9):e41152. https://doi.org/10.2196/41152.
13. Mitsopoulos, K., Fiska, V., Tagaras, K., et al. NeuroSui-tUp: System Architecture and Validation of a Motor Rehabilitation Wearable Robotics and Serious Game Platform. Sensors. 2023;23(6):3281–3281. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063281.
14. Rautmare, S. and Bhalerao, D.M. MySQL and NoSQL database comparison for IoT application. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Advances in Computer Applications (ICACA); IEEE; 2016; pp.235–238. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACA.2016.7887957.
15. Gupta, A., Tyagi, S., Panwar, N., et al. NoSQL databases: Critical analysis and comparison. In 2017 International Conference on Computing and Communication Technologies for Smart Nation (IC3TSN), Gurgaon, India; IEEE; 2017; pp. 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3TSN.2017.8284494.
16. Schulz, W.L., Nelson, B.G., Felker, D.K., et al. Evaluation of relational and NoSQL database architectures to manage genomic annotations. J Biomed Inform. 2016;64:288–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2016.10.015.
17. Clark, B.C., Manini, T.M., Thé, D.J., et al. Gender differences in skeletal muscle fatigability are related to contraction type and EMG spectral compression. J Appl Physiol. 2003;94(6):2263–2272. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00926.2002.
18. Bridges, A.J. and Holler, K.A. How Many is Enough? Determining Optimal Sample Sizes for Normative Studies in Pediatric Neuropsychology. Child Neuropsychol. 2007;13(6):528–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040701233875.
19. Piovesana, A. and Senior, G. How Small Is Big: Sample Size and Skewness. Assessment. 2016;25(6):793–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116669784.
20. Wu, Y.C. and Lin, I.M. The Resting State of Taiwan EEG Normative Database: Z-Scores of Patients with Major Depressive Disorder as the Cross-Validation. Brain Sci. 2023;13(2):351. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020351.
21. Thatcher, R.W., Walker, R.A., Biver, C.J., et al. Quantitative EEG Normative Databases: Validation and Clinical Correlation. J Neurother. 2003;7(3–4):87–121. https://doi.org/10.1300/j184v07n03_05.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author(s) must obtain all parties consent [co-author(s), others if applicable] and submit the acceptance of Copyright Agreement with their paper. Written permission must be obtained by the author for material that has been published in copyrighted material; this includes tables, figures, and quoted text that exceeds 150 words. A copy of all permissions must accompany the manuscript when published in copyrighted material. The author(s) hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. Author(s) must clearly indicate that approval for publication has been received in cases of institutional ownership.
In all submitted material authors retain all copyrights; however, the GlobalCE Journal reserve the right to reprint all or portions of the article and to post all or part of the article online. GlobalCE Journal reserves the right to edit manuscripts as required to publish in the journal. Authors are responsible for obtaining any and all clearances as appropriate. Unless stated otherwise, all articles are open-access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and original work (e.g. first published in the Global Clinical Engineering Journal) is properly cited with the original URL and bibliographic citation information. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on www.Globalce.org well as the copyright and license information must be included. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
