Accuracy of Control of Infusion Pumps in the Post-Market: A Practical Approach Based on IEC 60601-2-24:2012

Main Article Content

Diego Rosa https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2422-8453
Edison Silva https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5397-088X
Miguel Nunes
Henrique Moriya https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1595-1779
Paulo Zanuzzio
Danilo Nascimento

Keywords

Infusion pump, Accuracy, Post-market, Clinical engineering

Abstract

Background: Infusion pumps are critical medical devices widely used in clinical practice, particularly in intensive care units, where precise delivery of fluids and medications is essential for patient safety. Deviations in flow rate accuracy may lead to underinfusion or overinfusion, potentially compromising therapeutic outcomes. Post-market surveillance of infusion pump performance is therefore a key component of clinical engineering strategies, especially under real-use hospital conditions; Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the post-market flow rate accuracy of volumetric infusion pumps used at the University Hospital of the University of São Paulo (HU-USP), Brazil, in accordance with the requirements of the IEC 60601-2-24:2012 standard; Material and Methods: Three volumetric infusion pumps of the same model, allocated in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), were evaluated. Flow rate accuracy tests were conducted using a measurement system composed of an analytical balance and dedicated software developed for automated data acquisition and processing. The pumps were tested at a low flow rate of 1 mL/hour over 24 hours under ambient pressure conditions, and at a nominal flow rate of 25 mL/hour over 2 hours under three conditions: ambient pressure, overpressure (+100 mmHg), and vacuum (−100 mmHg). The measured flow rates were compared with the accuracy limits specified by the manufacturer; Results: At the flow rate of 1 mL/h, two of the three infusion pumps did not comply with the manufacturer’s specified accuracy limit (±5%), exhibiting underinfusion. At 25 mL/h, all evaluated pumps demonstrated deviations exceeding the expected tolerance, particularly when subjected to pressure variations. In addition, all devices exhibited a consistent delay of approximately 11 minutes in completing the 24-hour infusion period, despite being newly acquired and previously unopened. These findings indicate performance deviations under post-market conditions that may not be identified through routine acceptance testing alone; Conclusion: The results highlight the importance of implementing systematic post-market performance evaluation of infusion pumps as part of clinical engineering management practices. Even newly acquired devices may present deviations that pose potential risks to patient safety, especially in pediatric intensive care environments. The study supports the expansion of this evaluation methodology to the entire infusion pump inventory of the University Hospital, currently comprising 221 devices, and to testing scenarios involving clinically relevant medications and operating conditions. Such an approach contributes to evidence-based decision-making in medical technology management and to the continuous improvement of healthcare quality and safety.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract 12 | PDF Downloads 7

References

1.Bates, D.W., Boyle, D.L., Vander Vliet, M.B., et al. Relationship between medication errors and adverse drug events. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10(4):199–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600255.
2.Van der Sluijs, A.F., van Slobbe-Bijlsma, E.R., Goossens, A., et al. Reducing errors in the administration of medication with infusion pumps in the intensive care department: a lean approach. SAGE Open Med. 2019;7:2050312118822629. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118822629.
3.Ohashi, K., Dalleur, O., Dykes, P.C., et al. Benefits and risks of using smart pumps to reduce medication error rates: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2014;37(12):1011–1020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0232-1.
4.Husch, M., Sullivan, C., Rooney, D., et al. Insights from the sharp end of intravenous medication errors: implications for infusion pump technology. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(2):80–86. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.011957.
5.Etelvino, M.A.L., Pereira, M.G., Barreiro Filho, R.D. Risk management in infusion pumps (Gerenciamento de risco em bombas de infusão). Vigil Sanit Debate. 2019;7(4):61–66. (in Portuguese). https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269X.01365.
6.Metaxiotou, Z., Bissig, H., Batista, E., et al. Metrology in health: challenges and solutions in infusion therapy and diagnostics. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2022;68(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2022-0045.
7.Van der Eijk, A.C., van Rens, R.M.F.P.T., Dankelman, J., et al. A literature review on flow-rate variability in neonatal IV therapy. Pediatr Anesth. 2013;23(1):9–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12039.
8.Voss, G.I., Butterfield, R.D. Parental infusion devices. In: Bronzino JD, editor. The Biomedical Engineering Handbook, 3rd ed. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL; 2006, pp. 1311–1321.
9.dos Silva, M.S., Fernandes, L.A., Brandão, M.R., et al. Analysis of the description of failures involving the operation of infusion pumps in a Brazilian hospital. In Proceedings of the XXIII Argentinian Congress of Bioengineering (SABI 2022) and the XII Clinical Engineering Conference, San Juan, Argentina, September 13–16, 2022; Lopez NM, Tello E, Eds.. IFMBE Proceedings, Springer: Cham, Switzerland; 2024. pp. 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51723-5_30.
10.Moreira, A.P.A., Carvalho, M.F., Silva, R.C.L., et al. Handling errors in conventional and smart pump infusions: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2019;53:e03562. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2018032603562.
11.Bottaro, M., Viana, V., Soares, F.C.S. Performance evaluation and electrical safety in electromedical devices (Avaliação de desempenho e segurança elétrica nos dispositivos eletromédicos). In: Advances and Challenges in the Industrial Complex of Health Products (Avanços e Desafios no Complexo Industrial em Produtos para Saúde). Ministério da Saúde: Brasília; 2017, pp. 139–150. (in Portuguese).
12.Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, Anvisa). Resolução RDC nº 549, of August 30, 2021. Imprensa Nacional: Brasília (DF); 2021. (in Portuguese). Available onine: https://anvisalegis.datalegis.net/action/ActionDatalegis.php?acao=abrirTextoAto&cod_menu=8542&cod_modulo=310&link=S&numeroAto=00000549&orgao=RDC%2FDC%2FANVISA%2FMS&seqAto=000&tipo=RDC&valorAno=2021.
13.Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, Anvisa). Guideline for notifications in medical device vigilance. (Cartilha de Notificações em Tecnovigilância). Anvisa: Brasília (DF); 2003. (in Portuguese). Available online: https://bibliotecadigital.anvisa.gov.br/jspui/handle/anvisa/2039.
14.Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, Anvisa). Notifications in medical device vigilance (Notificações em Tecnovigilância). Anvisa: Brasília (DF); 2025. (in Portuguese). Available online: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/acessoainformacao/dadosabertos/informacoes-analiticas/tecnovigilancia/notificacoes-tecnovigilancia.
15.Silva Filho, E. Electrical safety of medical devices in the post-market context: A practical approach for cardiac defibrillators based on ABNT NBR IEC 62353:2019 (Segurança Elétrica de Equipamentos Médicos no Contexto de Pós-mercado: Uma Abordagem Prática em Desfibriladores Cardíacos com Base na Norma ABNT NBR IEC 62353:2019). Master’s Thesis. Universidade de São Paulo, Escola Politécnica: São Paulo, Brazil; 2025. (in Portuguese). https://doi.org/10.11606/D.3.2025.tde-15092025-072155.
16.International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Medical Electrical Equipment – Part 2-24: Particular Requirements for the Basic Safety and Essential Performance of Infusion Pumps and Controllers. IEC 60601-2-24:2015. IEC: Geneva, Switzerland; 2015, pp.123.
17.Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT), Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Qualidade e Tecnologia (Inmetro). Avaliação de dados de medição—Guia para a expressão de incerteza de medição (ABNT ISO/IEC Guia 98-3:2012; JCGM 100:2008). ABNT/Inmetro: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 2012. Available online: https://www.gov.br/inmetro/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/documentos-tecnicos-em-metrologia/gum_final.pdf.
18.International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC). Guidelines on Decision Rules and Statements of Conformity (ILAC G8:09/2019). ILAC: Newton, South Australia, Australia; 2019. Available online: https://ilac.org/publications-and-resources/ilac-guidance-series/.
19.International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Water for Analytical Laboratory Use: Specification and Test Methods. ISO 3696:1987. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland; 1987.